How Oakstone Secured Smarsh’s Preferred Enterprise Account Manager

Smarsh Enterprise Account Manager Case Study

Oakstone International partnered with Smarsh to appoint an Enterprise Account Manager responsible for a select group of strategic, tier-one financial services accounts across the Southeast US. With a narrow talent pool and highly specific requirements, Oakstone identified Smarsh’s preferred candidate: an experienced enterprise technology seller with direct experience across four of the six target accounts and a strong track record of developing complex, high-value opportunities. As a successful and highly passive candidate with a history of long-term tenure, securing his commitment required a carefully managed recruitment process built around patience rather than pressure. Over several months, Oakstone worked closely with both Smarsh and the candidate, adapting the hiring process to give both sides the time and insight needed to make a confident long-term decision, ultimately securing Smarsh’s preferred hire.

---

About Smarsh

Smarsh provides cloud-based archiving and compliance solutions for companies in regulated and litigious industries. The company’s centralised platform provides a unified compliance and e-discovery workflow across a range of digital communications systems, including emails, public and enterprise social media, websites, and instant and mobile messaging. It serves the regulatory compliance, e-discovery, and record retention requirements of financial services, healthcare and life sciences, the public sector, and other industries.

Search Background

Smarsh approached Oakstone International to support the search for a highly experienced Enterprise Account Manager to take responsibility for a small number of strategic, tier-one banking and lending accounts across the Southeast US.

This newly created position required considerably more than traditional enterprise sales experience. Smarsh wanted a heavyweight strategic seller with a proven ability to navigate complex financial services organisations, build relationships with senior stakeholders and develop significant enterprise opportunities within a defined group of high-value accounts.

The geographical and account requirements made the potential talent pool particularly narrow. Smarsh was looking for someone based in the Southeast who ideally already understood and had experience selling into specific organisations within the territory.

Requirements

The successful candidate needed an established track record of selling complex, high-value technology solutions into major financial services organisations, with the credibility and experience to engage at C-suite level.

Previous exposure to the targeted accounts was particularly valuable because the role would focus on six major financial services organisations within the region. Smarsh needed someone who understood how these businesses operated, could identify the right stakeholders and had the patience and commercial experience required to develop large, strategic opportunities.

Oakstone also recognised that the opportunity needed to appeal to a very particular type of candidate. Smarsh is an established business operating at significant scale, and the position offered the opportunity to work on seven- and potentially eight-figure enterprise deals. This was important when approaching candidates who were already successful and unlikely to consider moving to an early-stage organisation.

Oakstone’s Approach and Solution

Oakstone conducted a highly targeted search focused on geography, strategic financial services experience and previous exposure. The search produced about 14 candidates, with Smarsh meeting around 12 as the team maintained a deliberately high standard throughout.

One candidate quickly emerged as an exceptional potential fit. He was based in Atlanta and had already sold into four of the six strategic accounts within the territory. More importantly, he understood how to navigate these organisations, engage the appropriate stakeholders and develop complex enterprise opportunities.

However, Oakstone quickly recognised that hiring this candidate would require a different approach.

With close to two decades spent across just two companies, including ten years at his current company, the candidate demonstrated exceptional loyalty and was unlikely to make a career move quickly. During his time at his current company, the candidate had exceeded target in seven of ten years and had earned more than $1 million in four of those years. He was successful, secure, and had the option of remaining with his existing employer, so he had little reason to rush a decision on a new opportunity.

Rather than pushing the desired candidate through a conventional recruitment timetable, Oakstone advised a gradual, layered process that allowed him to properly evaluate Smarsh, the role and the long-term career opportunity.

Oakstone also incorporated additional conversations with people across sales, presales, and customer success, allowing the candidate to understand how Smarsh sold, demonstrated, and delivered its technology. Multiple conversations with leadership also gave both sides time to build confidence.

Throughout the process, Oakstone remained close to both parties, advising Smarsh when additional time was beneficial rather than attempting to manufacture urgency. The candidate later confirmed that this approach mattered; had he felt pressured into a quick decision, he would have been more likely to withdraw from the process.

Challenges

The greatest challenge was balancing momentum with patience.

For many senior searches, speed is important. In this case, moving too quickly risked losing the preferred candidate. The candidate approached career decisions methodically and, given his history of staying with employers for many years, needed enough time and information to feel confident his next move could offer similar longevity.

At the same time, Oakstone could not let the wider search depend on a single candidate. While the one candidate increasingly became Smarsh’s preferred choice, the team continued working the market and maintaining alternative options in the background in case the process did not convert.

This required continued investment in the search while carefully managing the desired candidates process over approximately four to six months. Smarsh also demonstrated considerable patience, recognising that securing the strongest person in the market mattered more than accelerating the process and potentially compromising the quality of the hire.

Compensation created an additional consideration. The opportunity could not be made attractive simply through a significantly increased package, so the candidate needed to be convinced by the substance of the role itself: the accounts, technology, scale of Smarsh, and long-term potential. This ultimately helped ensure the decision was driven by the right career reasons rather than purely financial motivation.

Search Results

After an extensive and carefully managed search, the candidate accepted the opportunity to join Smarsh as Enterprise Account Manager.

The search succeeded by identifying someone with the required experience and recognising how that individual needed to be recruited.

The candidate brought direct experience with four of the six strategic accounts, extensive enterprise technology sales experience, and a strong record of performance in complex, high-value sales environments. His background closely matched Smarsh's requirement for someone capable of developing major C-level opportunities across some of the largest financial services organisations in the region.

The process took considerably longer than a typical search, but both Smarsh and Oakstone recognised that speed was not the appropriate measure of success in this instance. With each stage, Smarsh grew more confident in the preferred candidate, while the preferred candidate grew more confident that Smarsh represented the right long-term move.

The result was the successful appointment of Smarsh's preferred candidate and an example of why executive and strategic hiring processes sometimes need to be adapted around the individual rather than forcing every candidate through the same timetable.

For candidates who are successful, passive and highly selective about their next move, patience can be just as important as pace.