Is AI Killing Your Brand Reputation and Candidate Experience?

8 Jul

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being utilised in our everyday lives to enhance businesses, making them faster, more innovative, and more efficient. It has become a recruiter's best friend. Screening CVs, scheduling interviews, and even sending out rejection emails are just the start of what it's doing to help hire the right people.

While automation promises speed and efficiency, it can come at a hidden cost in the form of damage to your employer brand and reputation.

The most common way AI is being used in recruitment is to screen CVs and send automated responses, and that's where the danger often begins.

These issues can seriously affect your employer brand, especially if candidates feel they're being judged unfairly by a machine.

1. Lack of Personalisation Feels Disrespectful

Job seekers often spend hours tailoring their CVs, researching your company, and writing thoughtful cover letters, especially for roles they're genuinely excited about. When their application is met with a cold, generic rejection, or worse, no response at all, it sends a clear (and damaging) message: your effort didn't matter.

An impersonal, automated message like "Unfortunately, you have not been successful" with no context or name can feel dismissive.

This lack of acknowledgement can be demoralising. It erodes trust in your company and reflects poorly on your values. Candidates who feel dehumanised by the process are less likely to apply again, recommend your company to others, or speak positively about their experience.

Personalisation such as using their name, referencing the role they applied for, or acknowledging their effort can go a long way in creating a more respectful and human connection.

2. Missed Opportunity to Build Employer Brand

Every interaction with a candidate (successful or not) is a chance to reinforce your employer brand. Rejection emails are no exception and can be one of the most overlooked opportunities to make a lasting, positive impression.

A thoughtful and well-crafted rejection message demonstrates professionalism, empathy, and respect. It communicates that you value the time and interest the candidate invested, even if they weren't the right fit this time. Many candidates will walk away with more respect for your company simply because you treated them well in a disappointing moment.

Alternatively, a robotic or poorly worded response can quickly undo all the goodwill your brand has built. Candidates who feel disrespected may vent their frustration on platforms like LinkedIn, Glassdoor, or Reddit, where the damage to your reputation can be both visible and long-lasting.

This matters because candidates are also potential customers, future applicants, and influencers in their networks. A single negative experience can discourage others from applying or working with you. A positive one, even in rejection, can turn a candidate into an advocate who speaks highly of your process, which is priceless in competitive talent markets.

Rejection is not just a formality. It's a branding opportunity.

3. Signals a Transactional Culture

Impersonal, automated rejections often suggest that the company prioritises speed and efficiency over empathy and connection.

The lack of care can be a significant warning sign as it raises questions about what the company truly values: Is this how they treat their people internally? Will I be seen as a person here or just a resource?

Culture and leadership style matter more than ever. Candidates are increasingly looking for environments where empathy, communication, and psychological safety are prioritised. If your rejection process feels cold or robotic, it may signal that those values are lacking at a deeper level, and that's enough for great candidates to walk away.

It's not just about who you hire; it's also about who you lose because your process felt transactional instead of human.

4. AI Errors Can Be Embarrassing

While automation can save time, it's not immune to mistakes. In recruitment, even minor errors can have significant consequences. AI-generated rejection emails that incorrectly spell a name wrong, reference the wrong job title, or use awkward, overly formal language can instantly damage your company's credibility.

These kinds of errors make your process look careless and impersonal. To the candidate, it's clear that no one took the time to review the message before it was sent, and that can feel insulting, especially after they've invested time and effort in applying.

Worse still, these messages often find their way onto social media or public forums, such as LinkedIn and Glassdoor, where they're shared not just as one-off errors but as examples of how not to treat people. What might seem like a minor mistake internally can quickly spiral into reputational damage externally.

A single poorly worded or inaccurate message can undermine the professionalism of your entire hiring process and your brand.

The solution? If you're using AI or automated templates, always include a human review step to ensure accuracy. Accuracy and tone matter just as much as efficiency.

5. Potential for Bias or Legal Risk

AI tools are only as fair and effective as the data and rules on which they're built. If these systems are not carefully audited, monitored, and updated, they can unintentionally reinforce bias and screen out candidates based on discriminatory factors such as age, gender, ethnicity, educational background, or employment gaps.

AI decision-making can often mean candidates rarely understand why they've been rejected. Without transparency, this can lead to frustration and suspicion, especially if they feel unfairly judged or overlooked.

Inconsistent or unexplained outcomes can cause candidates to question the objectivity of your entire hiring process causing a reputational risk, however, it can also become a legal one. If rejected applicants believe they were mistreated due to biased algorithms, they can take legal action, particularly in regions where the use of AI in recruitment is increasingly regulated.

Using AI without oversight not only risks alienating candidates but also erodes trust, attracts negative attention, and exposes your company to real compliance and legal challenges.

To avoid this, AI tools should be transparent, explainable, and regularly audited for bias, and there should always be a human involved in critical decisions.

6. Breaks the Candidate-Hiring Team Connection

When a candidate has direct interaction with a hiring manager or recruiter, whether through a call, interview, or even email exchange, they naturally expect a more human conclusion to the process. A sudden, automated rejection from a no-reply email address can feel like a sharp disconnect, especially after what may have been a warm or engaging conversation.

Impersonal "close off's" can leave candidates feeling confused, disappointed, or even misled.

That disconnection doesn't just affect how the candidate feels, it weakens the overall perception of your company's values and undermines any goodwill the hiring team worked to build. In some cases, it can even undo the positive impact of earlier interactions and reduce the likelihood of the candidate reapplying in the future or recommending the company to others.

Roles involving direct engagement and human follow-up reinforce respect, strengthen your brand, and keep doors open for future opportunities.

While AI has a role in streamlining hiring workflows, rejection is a sensitive touchpoint, and CV screening remains a critical filter. If AI is poorly implemented or left unchecked, it can give the impression that your company is cold, careless, or unfair, traits that erode trust and deter future applicants.

The best companies strike a balance between automation and human judgment. Those who handle rejections and screening with thoughtfulness, transparency, and respect build long-term brand equity and stay ahead in the talent game.

Rejection is a sensitive moment in the candidate's journey. It deserves more than a cold, automated message. If you don't have the internal capacity to give applicants the respect and care they deserve, working with a trusted recruitment partner can bridge that gap.

A good recruitment partner doesn't just screen candidates; they represent your brand, offer thoughtful communication, and manage expectations with empathy and professionalism. They ensure that even candidates who aren't selected walk away with a positive impression of your company, keeping your talent pipeline strong and your reputation intact.

People remember how you made them feel, especially when things didn't go their way.

Contact Oakstone